invis is
millions of happy teen smiles.

Gu, J et al. Evaluation of Invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop February 2017; 151:259-66. Buschang, P et al. Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthodontist, Vol 84, No 3, 2014.

 In a pain score of 1-9, 1 being extremely painful and 9 not at all painful, Invisalign U.S. teenager patients (Qty:73) rated pain score of 6.1 vs U.S. traditional metal braces teenager patients (Qty: 76) rated pain score of 5.1.

Percentage of dental hygienists that primarily work in a practice offering the Invisalign system who ‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’ to the question, “During Invisalign clear aligner treatment, most patients have less plaque compared to patients undergoing fixed appliance treatment.” (n=135)

Data on File at Align Technology, as of July 12, 2017: Based on a global claims survey by Actionable Research of Invisalign providers, respondents were asked the following question: In what percent of cases do patients require an emergency visit? (Global respondents N= 898)